From 34eaf8660a011930bc1a46c93f2db69cf3c28a01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leah Rowe Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 17:03:13 +0100 Subject: replace links to wikipedia free software article with FSF Free Software article --- docs/index.md | 4 ++-- www/faq.md | 4 ++-- www/index.md | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/index.md b/docs/index.md index a8f27735..71828068 100644 --- a/docs/index.md +++ b/docs/index.md @@ -34,14 +34,14 @@ Other information About the libreboot project =========================== -Libreboot is a [free](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software) and Open +Libreboot is a [free](https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) and Open Source BIOS or UEFI replacement, initialising the hardware and booting your operating system. We are a member of the [Peers Community](https://peers.community/) project, an organisation that supports Free Software. Libreboot is a [coreboot](http://coreboot.org/) distribution (distro) with proprietary software removed, intended to be a -[free](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software) (libre) 'BIOS' +[free](https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) (libre) 'BIOS' replacement for your computer. The project is aimed at users, attempting to make coreboot as easy to use as possible. diff --git a/www/faq.md b/www/faq.md index aeb0fd91..96c94246 100644 --- a/www/faq.md +++ b/www/faq.md @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ by the operating system kernel, but on all recent systems it is the boot firmware that must perform this task. Coreboot does distribute microcode updates for Intel and AMD CPUs, but libreboot cannot, because the whole point of libreboot is to be 100% [free -software](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software). +software](https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html). On some older Intel CPUs, it is possible to exclude the microcode updates and not have any reliability issues in practise. All current @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ when it comes to user freedom. Libreboot has no support recent Intel platforms, precisely because of the problems described above. The only way to solve this is to get Intel to change their policies and to be more friendly to the [free -software](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software) community. +software](https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) community. Reverse engineering won't solve anything long-term, unfortunately, but we need to keep doing it anyway. Moving forward, Intel hardware is a non-option unless a radical change happens within Intel. diff --git a/www/index.md b/www/index.md index 6daa8274..63dc327b 100644 --- a/www/index.md +++ b/www/index.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ mascot"){#logo}](faq.md#who-did-the-logo) [Report bugs](https://notabug.org/libreboot/libreboot/issues) -- [Send patches](git.md) -Libreboot is a [free](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software) and Open +Libreboot is a [free](https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) and Open Source BIOS or UEFI replacement, initialising the hardware and booting your operating system. We are a member of the [Peers Community](https://peers.community/) project, an organisation that -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2