From 225b321dd6d0c131ce07c800c04ab2baf17be018 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Francis Rowe Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:30:34 +0100 Subject: docs/hcl/c201.html: Debian/Fedora: use less callous language --- docs/hcl/c201.html | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/hcl') diff --git a/docs/hcl/c201.html b/docs/hcl/c201.html index f58ca4af..ed6f9f53 100644 --- a/docs/hcl/c201.html +++ b/docs/hcl/c201.html @@ -149,8 +149,15 @@ endorsed at all, and mistakes can happen.

- Note that this does not mean Debian is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Debian is rotten because it distributes proprietary software, - even if it's optional and not included by default. + Note that this does not mean Debian is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Debian is not ideal because it distributes proprietary software, + even if it's optional and not included by default. At the same time, they also do amazing work on things like reproducible builds (recent example), + and it's the underpin design upon which both Trisquel is ultimately based. Debian does a lot of good work, so it's a shame that they have this + silly issue, even after several years. +

+

+ The libreboot project calls on Debian, to outsource the hosting and documentation for non-free and contrib + to a separate, third party project (like what Fedora does, as described below). Debian, if you do this, the libreboot project + will recommend Debian as #1 preferred distro :)

There are linux-libre builds available for Debian, but only on x86 thus far. See: @@ -167,7 +174,7 @@ Then, delete linux and replace it with linux-libre.

- Note that this does not mean Fedora is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Fedora is rotten because it distributes proprietary software, + Note that this does not mean Fedora is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Fedora is not ideal because it distributes proprietary software, even if it's easy to remove.

-- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2