From ae631ce6c360856ab83557b977a182c38fefa56d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francis Rowe
@@ -93,6 +93,67 @@
+ This laptop comes preinstalled (from the factory) with Google ChromeOS. This is a GNU/Linux distribution, but it's not general purpose + and it comes with proprietary software. It's designed for SaaSS. Libreboot recommends that all users of this laptop replace it with another distribution. +
++ The FSF has a list of distributions that are 100% free software. None of these + are confirmed to work on ARM chromebooks yet. Parabola looks hopeful: + https://www.parabola.nu/news/parabola-supports-armv7/ +
++ The libreboot project would like to see all FSF-endorsed distro projects port to these laptops. This includes Trisquel, GuixSD and others. + And ProteanOS. Maybe even LibreCMC. The more the merrier. We need them, badly. +
++ There are some other distributions, which are not freedom-friendly (institutionally speaking), but can be with some tweaking. +
++ There isn't much choice, but we can recommend these distributions for the time being: +
++ The FSF details the problems with Debian: + https://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html#Debian +
++ You can actually run Debian without any proprietary software. The default installation comes without any proprietary software, + and although the project does have proprietary software, its only in a separate repository which isn't enabled by default. + The Debian project has a strict policy of keeping proprietary software out of the main repository, and moving it to a separate repository; + this repository is called non-free, with supplementary packages that require it in contrib, also not enabled by default. + If you install Debian and replace the kernel with linux-libre, + you can be reasonably certain not to install any proprietary software. However, make sure to exercise caution, since this isn't + endorsed at all, and mistakes can happen. +
++ Note that this does not mean Debian is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Debian is rotten because it distributes proprietary software, + even if it's optional and not included by default. +
++ Unlike Debian, Fedora (to the best of our knowledge) only distributes proprietary software in the form of firmware blobs for the Linux kernel. + There are repositories for Fedora that contain proprietary software, but none of these are official and have to be added. So just don't add them. + Then, delete linux and replace it with linux-libre. +
++ Note that this does not mean Fedora is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Fedora is rotten because it distributes proprietary software, + even if it's easy to remove. +
++ As soon as possible, the libreboot project would like to remove mention of Fedora and Debian. + We find such distributions ethically repugnant. +
++ Back to top of page. +
+@@ -174,67 +235,6 @@ Back to top of page.
- This laptop comes preinstalled (from the factory) with Google ChromeOS. This is a GNU/Linux distribution, but it's not general purpose - and it comes with proprietary software. It's designed for SaaSS. Libreboot recommends that all users of this laptop replace it with another distribution. -
-- The FSF has a list of distributions that are 100% free software. None of these - are confirmed to work on ARM chromebooks yet. Parabola looks hopeful: - https://www.parabola.nu/news/parabola-supports-armv7/ -
-- The libreboot project would like to see all FSF-endorsed distro projects port to these laptops. This includes Trisquel, GuixSD and others. - And ProteanOS. Maybe even LibreCMC. The more the merrier. We need them, badly. -
-- There are some other distributions, which are not freedom-friendly (institutionally speaking), but can be with some tweaking. -
-- There isn't much choice, but we can recommend these distributions for the time being: -
-- The FSF details the problems with Debian: - https://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html#Debian -
-- You can actually run Debian without any proprietary software. The default installation comes without any proprietary software, - and although the project does have proprietary software, its only in a separate repository which isn't enabled by default. - The Debian project has a strict policy of keeping proprietary software out of the main repository, and moving it to a separate repository; - this repository is called non-free, with supplementary packages that require it in contrib, also not enabled by default. - If you install Debian and replace the kernel with linux-libre, - you can be reasonably certain not to install any proprietary software. However, make sure to exercise caution, since this isn't - endorsed at all, and mistakes can happen. -
-- Note that this does not mean Debian is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Debian is rotten because it distributes proprietary software, - even if it's optional and not included by default. -
-- Unlike Debian, Fedora (to the best of our knowledge) only distributes proprietary software in the form of firmware blobs for the Linux kernel. - There are repositories for Fedora that contain proprietary software, but none of these are official and have to be added. So just don't add them. - Then, delete linux and replace it with linux-libre. -
-- Note that this does not mean Fedora is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Fedora is rotten because it distributes proprietary software, - even if it's easy to remove. -
-- As soon as possible, the libreboot project would like to remove mention of Fedora and Debian. - We find such distributions ethically repugnant. -
-- Back to top of page. -
-