From fb8d22f6ef43dcc989480329b381e5a3223762b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leah Rowe Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 04:18:57 +0000 Subject: docs/gnulinux/fsf-distros: Further explain why Trisquel is crap --- docs/fsf-distros/index.html | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/fsf-distros/index.html b/docs/fsf-distros/index.html index 808149fe..fb5fd390 100644 --- a/docs/fsf-distros/index.html +++ b/docs/fsf-distros/index.html @@ -64,6 +64,27 @@ Foundation. We are opposed to the FSF, and Trisquel endorses them, so endorsing Trisquel means endorsing the FSF.

+

+ The lead developer (Ruben Rodriguez) also works full-time as an FSF + sysadmin, and seems to barely have time to develop Trisquel these days. + As a result, with a lack of leadership (and Ruben presumably still + holding on), the project has stalled and will probably end + up becoming a dead distro. Critical security updates are currently + delayed compared to Ubuntu, their upstream! +

+

+ Several people within the Trisquel project have even left the + project as a result of this. For instance, this post on the Trisquel + forums clearly shows such discontent: + https://trisquel.info/en/forum/im-leaving-trisquel + +

+

+ We advice all users of Trisquel, whether they use libreboot or not, + to switch to the most similar free distribution, Debian, which is + listed on our official list of GNU+Linux + distributions recommendations. +

Ututo

It's a dead project. -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2