diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'www/news')
-rw-r--r-- | www/news/formalised-structure.md | 35 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | www/news/fsf-domain-offer.md | 15 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | www/news/proposal-rejoin-gnu.md | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | www/news/sfc-domain-offer.md | 36 |
4 files changed, 95 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/www/news/formalised-structure.md b/www/news/formalised-structure.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a630ff23 --- /dev/null +++ b/www/news/formalised-structure.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +% Formalising Democracy +% Alyssa Rosenzweig +% 25 Apr 2017 + +One month ago, the [Open Letter to the Free Software Community](/news/unity.md) +was published, alluding to the new Libreboot leadership. Today, the ideals +expressed there have been formalised into an official project policy. In the +new [General Management Guidelines](/management.md), the ins-and-outs of our +democratic system is codified, including the formal team list. Hint, hint: the +structure isn't "I, Alyssa Rosenzweig, decide everything and Thou shall bow +down to me"! There are four core team members, and we welcome community +feedback for major decisions. + +There was an underlying tension in the letter: should Libreboot rejoin GNU? On +purely political and technical levels, the answer is a resounding "yes". We +share the mission of spreading free software. Our communities overlap. Most of +the Libreboot community uses GNU software, and much of GNU uses libreboot. +Technically, the tighter integration is useful. Politically, closer ties will +strengthen both of our projects. But this is neither completely a political or +technical question -- it is a human one. + +There is no easy answer to this. But the best course of action is to reach out +beyond the team to the community at large. A number of people ranging from +Libreboot users to GNU developers to casual bystanders chimed in, and the +answer was an overwhelming "yes, you should have done this a month ago!" + +With that in mind, we have reapplied for GNU. Leah conducted the initial +discussions, such as the Reddit thread, as she felt that she needed to correct +her own error. I have since been handling the application itself, which was +submitted recently. GNU has not yet made a decision on the matter. Ultimately, +it will be up to Richard Stallman himself whether the mutual benefits of +joining will outweigh any potential awkwardness. + +No matter the response, Libreboot remains committed to free software. Whether +or not we need a g'new name, this will never change. diff --git a/www/news/fsf-domain-offer.md b/www/news/fsf-domain-offer.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..486e4cfc --- /dev/null +++ b/www/news/fsf-domain-offer.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +% Community feedback on whether to offer libreboot.org domain name to FSF +% Leah Rowe +% 26 Apr 2017 + +I, Leah Rowe, have stepped down as leader of the Libreboot project. This means +that I must also transfer ownership of the libreboot.org domain name to +another entity. I have chosen to propose the FSF as that entity. + +This is something that could be offered to GNU as part of Libreboot's +filed application to re-join GNU. + +Commenting will be taken on +<https://www.reddit.com/r/libreboot/comments/67rd46/proposal_transfer_librebootorg_ownership_to_fsf/> +as to whether this decision should be taken. Full reasoning is documented +there. diff --git a/www/news/proposal-rejoin-gnu.md b/www/news/proposal-rejoin-gnu.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..795821e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/www/news/proposal-rejoin-gnu.md @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +% Community feedback needed on whether Libreboot should re-join the GNU project +% +% 22 Apr 2017 + +Community feedback is needed on whether Libreboot should re-join the GNU +project, having previously been a member. The discussion place for this topic +is on [this thread in the Libreboot subreddit at reddit.com/r/libreboot/](https://www.reddit.com/r/libreboot/comments/66tdds/proposal_for_libreboot_rejoin_gnu_community/). With sufficient community support, Libreboot will +apply to re-join to become a member of the GNU project. Full reasoning and +history behind this proposal is detailed in the thread. diff --git a/www/news/sfc-domain-offer.md b/www/news/sfc-domain-offer.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f53ce283 --- /dev/null +++ b/www/news/sfc-domain-offer.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +% Community feedback on whether to offer libreboot.org domain name to SFC +% Leah Rowe +% 27 Apr 2017 + +I, Leah Rowe, have stepped down as leader of the Libreboot project. This means +that I must also transfer ownership of the libreboot.org domain name to +another entity. I have chosen to propose the Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) +as that entity. + +Commenting will be taken on +<https://www.reddit.com/r/libreboot/comments/67x3bs/proposal_transfer_librebootorg_domain_name/> +as to whether this decision should be taken. Full reasoning is documented +there. + +Software Freedom Conservancy is heavily affiliated with the FSF. Conservancy +provides legal services, e.g. GPL enforcement, for those who violate the GNU +General Public License. They generally offer legal services related to Free +Software. Its founder, Bradley Kuhn, is also a former Executive Director of +the FSF. (Karen Sandler, is SFC's current Executive Director). + +In addition to legal services, Conservancy also helps promote Free Software +and provides certain infrastructure for Free Software projects, and does +sometimes assist in development of projects. + +More information: +<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Freedom_Conservancy> + +Conservancy website: +<https://sfconservancy.org/> + +This is something that could be offered to GNU as part of Libreboot's +filed application to re-join GNU. + +Previously, it was proposed that the domain name be transferred to the FSF, but +this was vetoed by an opposing member of the core leadership, when I proposed +it. SFC was then recommended as an alternative, hence this new proposal. |