docs/gnulinux/fsf-distros: Further explain why Trisquel is crap

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/docs/fsf-distros/index.html b/docs/fsf-distros/index.html
index 808149fe..fb5fd390 100644
--- a/docs/fsf-distros/index.html
+++ b/docs/fsf-distros/index.html
@@ -64,6 +64,27 @@
                 Foundation. We are opposed to the FSF, and Trisquel endorses them,
                 so endorsing Trisquel means endorsing the FSF.
             </p>
+            <p>
+                The lead developer (Ruben Rodriguez) also works full-time as an FSF
+                sysadmin, and seems to barely have time to develop Trisquel these days.
+                As a result, with a lack of leadership (and Ruben presumably still
+                <em>holding on</em>), the project has stalled and will probably end
+                up becoming a dead distro. <em>Critical security updates are currently
+                delayed compared to Ubuntu, their upstream!</em>
+            </p>
+            <p>
+                Several people within the Trisquel project have even left the
+                project as a result of this. For instance, this post on the Trisquel
+                forums clearly shows such discontent:
+                <a href="https://trisquel.info/en/forum/im-leaving-trisquel">https://trisquel.info/en/forum/im-leaving-trisquel</a>
+
+            </p>
+            <p>
+                We advice all users of Trisquel, whether they use libreboot or not,
+                to switch to the most similar free distribution, Debian, which is
+                listed on our <a href="../distros/">official list of GNU+Linux
+                distributions recommendations</a>.
+            </p>
         <h2>Ututo</h2>
             <p>
                 It's a dead project.